Gu XQ, Zhong NN, Zhang KX, Cheng Z, Xiang Y, Ding XM, Yang JY, Zhang YY, Zhang D. Depression and anxiety symptoms among operating room nurses: Prevalence and correlations with occupational environmental factors. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 122321 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.122321]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We are pleased that this manuscript has been accepted and published in the journal. We sincerely thank the editor and all reviewers for their rigorous evaluation, critical remarks, and constructive suggestions during the peer-review process. Those valuable comments substantially strengthened the rationality of our study design, optimized result interpretation, improved the logic of discussion, and enhanced the readability of the manuscript. We also appreciate the editorial team for their efficient work throughout the submission and production stages. This published work lays a foundation for our subsequent related research.